<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Refactor Your Build Scripts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/12/refactor-your-build-scripts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/12/refactor-your-build-scripts/</link>
	<description>Trying to walk that thin line between intelligence and ignorance</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 20:54:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Davy Brion</title>
		<link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/12/refactor-your-build-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-23134</link>
		<dc:creator>Davy Brion</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:21:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=2017#comment-23134</guid>
		<description>if a build process is the same for multiple projects, then why wouldn&#039;t i solve the problem of having large, elaborate build scripts which all have to be modified when we modify the build process?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>if a build process is the same for multiple projects, then why wouldn&#8217;t i solve the problem of having large, elaborate build scripts which all have to be modified when we modify the build process?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ramon Smits</title>
		<link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/12/refactor-your-build-scripts/comment-page-1/#comment-23133</link>
		<dc:creator>Ramon Smits</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 09 Dec 2009 14:19:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=2017#comment-23133</guid>
		<description>What problem are you solving? You just removed the duplicate steps as in formalizing how each project should be build, tested, labeled and packaged?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What problem are you solving? You just removed the duplicate steps as in formalizing how each project should be build, tested, labeled and packaged?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
