Comments on: Slutty Types

By: Davy Brion

Davy Brion — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:13:17 +0000

oh i’ve seen some well rounded ones that made you deal with quite a few complex structures

By: Gibbo

Gibbo — Tue, 05 Jan 2010 13:03:58 +0000

Are normally flat and often expose only simple types.

By: Davy Brion

Davy Brion — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:39:49 +0000

hehe… they deal with multiple consumers without proper locking!

By: kilfour

kilfour — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:04:33 +0000

@Tim
Slutty types aren’t thread safe. They handle multiple users, but tend to avoid any kind of protection.

By: Tim

Tim — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:44:29 +0000

Are thread safe… can handle multiple users simultaneously

By: kilfour

kilfour — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:51:22 +0000

Slutty Types hide their real intentions.

By: Davy Brion

Davy Brion — Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:28:14 +0000

slutty types have a different view on what ‘class’ means

By: noah

noah — Tue, 13 Oct 2009 03:16:13 +0000

slutty types are sometimes referred to as ‘loose’

you don’t want to find yourself checking out a slutty type

slutty types have a hard time looking at their own reflection (ehh…)

By: Gaurav Patel

Gaurav Patel — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:39:53 +0000

Slutty Types almost always have an open interface and prefer multiple inheritance.

By: Robbie Coleman

Robbie Coleman — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 23:18:22 +0000

if not properly sealed, they are bound to pass on problems to all inheritors

By: W.Meints

W.Meints — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 19:32:18 +0000

Slutty types never seem to demand any permission before using them.

By: den Ben

den Ben — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:33:17 +0000

when they expose something interesting, it is definitely some type of string

By: Stefan V

Stefan V — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 15:09:16 +0000

Tend to create a code smell

By: Trumpi

Trumpi — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 13:58:37 +0000

n. Gets mocked a lot by friend assemblies??

By: Jack

Jack — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 09:43:09 +0000

I’m a starter to Slutty Types, hope to known more about it.

By: kilfour

kilfour — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 06:50:56 +0000

Look cheap at first, but end up costing you a lot of money.

By: Brad Abrams

Brad Abrams — Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:16:34 +0000

I love it.. gotta put this in the next Framework Design Guidelines!

By: Ryan Roberts

Ryan Roberts — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 22:56:45 +0000

In before you get accused of being the reason there are so few women in the profession.

They are likely to be involved simultaneously in many concerns
They may well have confusing multi part names

By: Davy Brion

Davy Brion — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:46:13 +0000

@Danny

only in the short term

By: Danny

Danny — Sun, 11 Oct 2009 21:38:56 +0000

At least a slutty type will make your member function.