<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss
version="2.0"
xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
> <channel><title>Comments on: Could You Go Back To Coding Without Resharper?</title> <atom:link href="http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" /><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/</link> <description>inquisitive: adjective. given to inquiry, research, or asking questions; eager for knowledge; intellectually curious</description> <lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 11:42:42 +0000</lastBuildDate> <sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod> <sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency> <generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator> <item><title>By: julius</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-102760</link> <dc:creator>julius</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 20 Nov 2011 20:32:00 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-102760</guid> <description>VS 2010 is unable to fetch the Resharper license from the server at my workplace, becuase I am currently locked out of VPN and I am now using VS2010 without Resharper. It&#039;s just horrible. Live code error checking is disabled by default, you can&#039;t ctrl+click functions and class names, there is no code completion is ascx files, no ctrl+alt+b/go to implementation, no refactoring, etc.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>VS 2010 is unable to fetch the Resharper license from the server at my workplace, becuase I am currently locked out of VPN and I am now using VS2010 without Resharper. It&#8217;s just horrible. Live code error checking is disabled by default, you can&#8217;t ctrl+click functions and class names, there is no code completion is ascx files, no ctrl+alt+b/go to implementation, no refactoring, etc.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Alex Simkin</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-51806</link> <dc:creator>Alex Simkin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:27:48 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-51806</guid> <description>@Mike&quot;It told me to do things that went against normal coding practices.&quot;
Like what?</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Mike</p><p>&#8220;It told me to do things that went against normal coding practices.&#8221;<br
/> Like what?</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-51803</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 06 Aug 2010 18:15:19 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-51803</guid> <description>After the installation my machine ground to a halt.  The intellisense took forever and my keyboard shortcuts were overwritten.  It told me to do things that went against normal coding practices.  I feel it is for lazy programmers, which is where the suggestion to use it came from.I have since uninstalled it and like many in my office never plan on using it again.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After the installation my machine ground to a halt.  The intellisense took forever and my keyboard shortcuts were overwritten.  It told me to do things that went against normal coding practices.  I feel it is for lazy programmers, which is where the suggestion to use it came from.</p><p> I have since uninstalled it and like many in my office never plan on using it again.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: vittore</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-29959</link> <dc:creator>vittore</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 08:31:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-29959</guid> <description>i was using R# for a several month and than go back to plain VS shortcuts. The only feature that i miss so much from R# is a convenient search files through part of identifier name or file name, cuz VS only allows you to quickly open file when you know it&#039;s precious name.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i was using R# for a several month and than go back to plain VS shortcuts. The only feature that i miss so much from R# is a convenient search files through part of identifier name or file name, cuz VS only allows you to quickly open file when you know it&#8217;s precious name.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark Jones</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22801</link> <dc:creator>Mark Jones</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 23 Oct 2009 20:47:06 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22801</guid> <description>I used Resharper from the version 1 days all through 4.5.1.
I saw it become more and more unstable with each new release.  I stopped using it at version 4 because it was slowing down VS so much I was actually more productive without it.  The Jetbrains folks promised stability and speed improvements in 4.5, so I paid for the upgrade ONCE AGAIN.  It was only a few days before I uninstalled it again; I got tired of going into the add-in manager and disabling Resharper so I had some kind of response back in VS after each few minutes of use.  I tried a bunch of nightly releases, then 4.5.1, before I finally have officially given up on Resharper as a lost cause.Oh, and over the years I have submitted many, many issues, discussed these issues in the forums, all to no avail.  Resharper is all about new features, and not about stability of existing features.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I used Resharper from the version 1 days all through 4.5.1.<br
/> I saw it become more and more unstable with each new release.  I stopped using it at version 4 because it was slowing down VS so much I was actually more productive without it.  The Jetbrains folks promised stability and speed improvements in 4.5, so I paid for the upgrade ONCE AGAIN.  It was only a few days before I uninstalled it again; I got tired of going into the add-in manager and disabling Resharper so I had some kind of response back in VS after each few minutes of use.  I tried a bunch of nightly releases, then 4.5.1, before I finally have officially given up on Resharper as a lost cause.</p><p>Oh, and over the years I have submitted many, many issues, discussed these issues in the forums, all to no avail.  Resharper is all about new features, and not about stability of existing features.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Kirk Klobe</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22613</link> <dc:creator>Kirk Klobe</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 20:24:15 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22613</guid> <description>You&#039;ll take my Resharper when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;ll take my Resharper when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: David Ridgway</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22593</link> <dc:creator>David Ridgway</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 16:29:32 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22593</guid> <description>Can&#039;t beat R#, especially in a Team Dev environment, you can enforce code normalization without killing your entire team! Set up the templates properly or even easier run the code clean up yourself before a build! Once you get the hang of it, the shortcut Jedi comes out in you and I figure I&#039;m at least 2 times faster than without it. I really can&#039;t handle using the VS (not so) intellisense anymore so would find it hard to give it up!
I still have some 10% discount coupons and 60 day extended trial licenses for ReSharper 4.5 if anyone is interested, see here for details:&lt;a href=&quot;http://web2asp.net/2009/09/resharper-discount-and-extended-trial.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;http://web2asp.net/2009/09/resharper-discount-and-extended-trial.html&lt;/a&gt;</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Can&#8217;t beat R#, especially in a Team Dev environment, you can enforce code normalization without killing your entire team! Set up the templates properly or even easier run the code clean up yourself before a build! Once you get the hang of it, the shortcut Jedi comes out in you and I figure I&#8217;m at least 2 times faster than without it. I really can&#8217;t handle using the VS (not so) intellisense anymore so would find it hard to give it up!</p><p>I still have some 10% discount coupons and 60 day extended trial licenses for ReSharper 4.5 if anyone is interested, see here for details:</p><p><a
href="http://web2asp.net/2009/09/resharper-discount-and-extended-trial.html" rel="nofollow">http://web2asp.net/2009/09/resharper-discount-and-extended-trial.html</a></p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Simon Martin</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22536</link> <dc:creator>Simon Martin</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:20:53 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22536</guid> <description>Personally I love CodeRush - and they&#039;re looking at introducing a Test Runner with it. Having seen this used in many DimeCasts I think this will be an awesome feature and will maybe persuade some R# users to have a serious look at CodeRush.The sheer number of shortcuts in R# is a bit bewildering in CodeRush there&#039;s just 1 shortcut that gives access to most of the refactorings so the learning curve is not as steep and you can become very productive very quickly.Could I go back to working without CodeRush? Of course, I could do all my coding in Notepad... but I wouldn&#039;t like it for long.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Personally I love CodeRush &#8211; and they&#8217;re looking at introducing a Test Runner with it. Having seen this used in many DimeCasts I think this will be an awesome feature and will maybe persuade some R# users to have a serious look at CodeRush.</p><p>The sheer number of shortcuts in R# is a bit bewildering in CodeRush there&#8217;s just 1 shortcut that gives access to most of the refactorings so the learning curve is not as steep and you can become very productive very quickly.</p><p>Could I go back to working without CodeRush? Of course, I could do all my coding in Notepad&#8230; but I wouldn&#8217;t like it for long.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Weekly Links #69 &#124; GrantPalin.com</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22493</link> <dc:creator>Weekly Links #69 &#124; GrantPalin.com</dc:creator> <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 01:03:50 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22493</guid> <description>[...] Could You Go Back To Coding Without Resharper? I&#8217;ve tried &#8211; it&#8217;s not easy to break the R# addiction&#8230; [...]</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Could You Go Back To Coding Without Resharper? I&#8217;ve tried &#8211; it&#8217;s not easy to break the R# addiction&#8230; [...]</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Soulhuntre</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22481</link> <dc:creator>Soulhuntre</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sun, 06 Sep 2009 01:09:30 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22481</guid> <description>For me it&#039;s CodeRush (I&#039;ve tried both, CR suits me much better than R#). In any case, I certainly can code without it, but I am much faster with it.Ken</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me it&#8217;s CodeRush (I&#8217;ve tried both, CR suits me much better than R#). In any case, I certainly can code without it, but I am much faster with it.</p><p>Ken</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: darren</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22462</link> <dc:creator>darren</dc:creator> <pubDate>Sat, 05 Sep 2009 04:30:37 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22462</guid> <description>I have used R# for I don&#039;t know how long.  Every once in a while I&#039;ll load up CodeRush to see if it is any better and every time I wind up un-installing it and going back to R#.In CodeRush I start typing then all of a sudden it is like my screen is exploding!  I find that I can&#039;t work without my Find Usages or my Code Cleanup.  But the worst is when I type {, I expect a } to show up but NO!  I have to type it myself!  The Horror!R# for ever.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have used R# for I don&#8217;t know how long.  Every once in a while I&#8217;ll load up CodeRush to see if it is any better and every time I wind up un-installing it and going back to R#.</p><p>In CodeRush I start typing then all of a sudden it is like my screen is exploding!  I find that I can&#8217;t work without my Find Usages or my Code Cleanup.  But the worst is when I type {, I expect a } to show up but NO!  I have to type it myself!  The Horror!</p><p>R# for ever.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Andrey Titov</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22448</link> <dc:creator>Andrey Titov</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 13:17:25 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22448</guid> <description>I have tried to start using Resharper several times, but finally I throws it away. It takes too much attention to itself. Resharper releases often are unstable. It uses too much memory, it appreciably reduces VS responsiveness. It is too smart - it tries to make me feel that it&#039;s better know how to write the code I&#039;m writing. As if somebody seat behind my back and on each typed word cries that I&#039;m doing all wrong, that this &quot;if&quot; should be written in reverse way, and if I click on it&#039;s suggestioning lamp and allow to switch order, than it again cries &quot;did you know that reverse order is also possible? :-p&quot;. This makes me furious.For me Resharper is not tool for development (implementation). Yes, it provides a lot of things for speed up coding, but it also have a much things for distract you from logic you implementing and take too much attention on code you write.Resharper is a great tool for organize code. When you finished some part of functionality and get it work, than you can seat down with Resharper and make the code looks perfect. But I usually produce the good code at once, that there nothing to do with Resharper.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have tried to start using Resharper several times, but finally I throws it away. It takes too much attention to itself. Resharper releases often are unstable. It uses too much memory, it appreciably reduces VS responsiveness. It is too smart &#8211; it tries to make me feel that it&#8217;s better know how to write the code I&#8217;m writing. As if somebody seat behind my back and on each typed word cries that I&#8217;m doing all wrong, that this &#8220;if&#8221; should be written in reverse way, and if I click on it&#8217;s suggestioning lamp and allow to switch order, than it again cries &#8220;did you know that reverse order is also possible? :-p&#8221;. This makes me furious.</p><p>For me Resharper is not tool for development (implementation). Yes, it provides a lot of things for speed up coding, but it also have a much things for distract you from logic you implementing and take too much attention on code you write.</p><p>Resharper is a great tool for organize code. When you finished some part of functionality and get it work, than you can seat down with Resharper and make the code looks perfect. But I usually produce the good code at once, that there nothing to do with Resharper.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: John</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22447</link> <dc:creator>John</dc:creator> <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 04:29:43 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22447</guid> <description>My trial expired and I am to cheap to buy it... yet. But I hated switching back to plain old visual studios, I really miss a bunch of the features.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My trial expired and I am to cheap to buy it&#8230; yet. But I hated switching back to plain old visual studios, I really miss a bunch of the features.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: JeroenH</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22440</link> <dc:creator>JeroenH</dc:creator> <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 06:09:38 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22440</guid> <description>I really like R# but for large solutions it can become a real memory hog (just look at the number of &#039;OutofMemory&#039; exception reports on their issue tracker site...). Also for large files (typically designer-generated), it can become very very slow.Still can&#039;t live without it but it&#039;s really annoying.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I really like R# but for large solutions it can become a real memory hog (just look at the number of &#8216;OutofMemory&#8217; exception reports on their issue tracker site&#8230;). Also for large files (typically designer-generated), it can become very very slow.</p><p>Still can&#8217;t live without it but it&#8217;s really annoying.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Aaron Powell</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22431</link> <dc:creator>Aaron Powell</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 10:19:56 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22431</guid> <description>I&#039;ve never saw the appeal of ReSharper, it always seemed that it was trying to do too much.I&#039;ve been using CodeRush express for a long time, I found it a nice balance between VS shortcuts and logical tools. I don&#039;t get why ReSharper needs to have live templates which always seemed to be like snippets, etc.I could survive quite easily without any plugins</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve never saw the appeal of ReSharper, it always seemed that it was trying to do too much.</p><p>I&#8217;ve been using CodeRush express for a long time, I found it a nice balance between VS shortcuts and logical tools. I don&#8217;t get why ReSharper needs to have live templates which always seemed to be like snippets, etc.</p><p>I could survive quite easily without any plugins</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Hernan Garcia</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22426</link> <dc:creator>Hernan Garcia</dc:creator> <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 01:56:55 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22426</guid> <description>No, specially for the refactorings. Either Resharper or CodeRush but no barebones VS. I&#039;m playing with VS 2010 and even when they have some nice features added, like generate from usage, I&#039;m still missing Resharper.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, specially for the refactorings. Either Resharper or CodeRush but no barebones VS. I&#8217;m playing with VS 2010 and even when they have some nice features added, like generate from usage, I&#8217;m still missing Resharper.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mark</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22423</link> <dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 17:37:34 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22423</guid> <description>As someone else said, the real power of R# is in its shortcuts.  I&#039;m not saying that extensive use of shortcuts is the only way to go in an addin (as someone else said Coderush uses the mouse to good effect), but with R#, once you learn the shortcuts you barely touch the mouse.The only time I touch the mouse now is when navigating code using ctrl-click and debugging.  When I&#039;m programming, I&#039;m pretty much 100% keyboard navigation + shortcuts now.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As someone else said, the real power of R# is in its shortcuts.  I&#8217;m not saying that extensive use of shortcuts is the only way to go in an addin (as someone else said Coderush uses the mouse to good effect), but with R#, once you learn the shortcuts you barely touch the mouse.</p><p>The only time I touch the mouse now is when navigating code using ctrl-click and debugging.  When I&#8217;m programming, I&#8217;m pretty much 100% keyboard navigation + shortcuts now.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Mike</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22422</link> <dc:creator>Mike</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:33:33 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22422</guid> <description>Not a chance. Seriously, I&#039;ve become addicted to some of the features.</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a chance. Seriously, I&#8217;ve become addicted to some of the features.</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harry</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22421</link> <dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:24:40 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22421</guid> <description>To Ercu,
I think the price is not that bad at all ... free would be better ... but compare to what developers are making .... I think it is reasonable. I cannot imagine carpenters without proper tools (though they are expensive for a lot of people).</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>To Ercu,<br
/> I think the price is not that bad at all &#8230; free would be better &#8230; but compare to what developers are making &#8230;. I think it is reasonable. I cannot imagine carpenters without proper tools (though they are expensive for a lot of people).</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> <item><title>By: Harry</title><link>http://davybrion.com/blog/2009/08/could-you-go-back-to-coding-without-resharper/comment-page-1/#comment-22420</link> <dc:creator>Harry</dc:creator> <pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:22:05 +0000</pubDate> <guid
isPermaLink="false">http://davybrion.com/blog/?p=1587#comment-22420</guid> <description>I am the only developer in my company using Resharper. It becomes a pain every time I need to help another person and using the person&#039;s bare environment. I am trying to convince my boss to give everyone a Resharper license. ...</description> <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am the only developer in my company using Resharper. It becomes a pain every time I need to help another person and using the person&#8217;s bare environment. I am trying to convince my boss to give everyone a Resharper license. &#8230;</p> ]]></content:encoded> </item> </channel> </rss>
<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/24 queries in 0.013 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 637/638 objects using disk: basic
Content Delivery Network via Amazon Web Services: CloudFront: d18sni7re4ly7f.cloudfront.net

Served from: davybrion.com @ 2012-02-09 03:00:56 -->
